https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797990 Unsubstantiated claims that auctioned land is assigned land cannot justify summary resumption or interference with a court-supervised sale. Registered transactions, revenue mutations, long uninterrupted possession and industrial use may support the need for formal adjudication where title is disputed. The State cannot determine its own title and dispossess persons in long possession through administrative resumption proceedings; whether land was assigned and transfers warranted resumption must be resolved in appropriate proceedings. On the stated facts, interference with the confirmed auction sale was unsustainable, the Company Court's confirmation was revived, the purchaser's possession was protected, and the connected writ matter required fresh consideration on merits. en-us Tue, 25 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Sep 2026 08:26:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797990 Unsubstantiated claims that auctioned land is assigned land cannot justify summary resumption or interference with a court-supervised sale. Registered transactions, revenue mutations, long uninterrupted possession and industrial use may support the need for formal adjudication where title is disputed. The State cannot determine its own title and dispossess persons in long possession through administrative resumption proceedings; whether land was assigned and transfers warranted resumption must be resolved in appropriate proceedings. On the stated facts, interference with the confirmed auction sale was unsustainable, the Company Court's confirmation was revived, the purchaser's possession was protected, and the connected writ matter required fresh consideration on merits. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 25 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797990