<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (10) TMI 213 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53529</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the suspension of the Customs House Agent license, ruling that the order lacked specificity and failed to follow the prescribed procedure under Regulation 20(2) of the Custom House Agent Licensing Regulations, 2004. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of due process and proper grounds for suspension, granting the Commissioner the opportunity to issue a new order in compliance with the law. The appeal was thus disposed of in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 17:12:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92006" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (10) TMI 213 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53529</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the suspension of the Customs House Agent license, ruling that the order lacked specificity and failed to follow the prescribed procedure under Regulation 20(2) of the Custom House Agent Licensing Regulations, 2004. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of due process and proper grounds for suspension, granting the Commissioner the opportunity to issue a new order in compliance with the law. The appeal was thus disposed of in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53529</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>