<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 65 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798039</link>
    <description>Parallel State GST assessment and rectification proceedings cannot be sustained where Central GST authorities have already adjudicated identical issues for the same assessment period. The pendency of an appeal against the earlier Central GST adjudication does not permit duplicate State GST proceedings on those matters. State GST assessment and rectification orders covering the same issues and period are therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 09:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=920032" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 65 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798039</link>
      <description>Parallel State GST assessment and rectification proceedings cannot be sustained where Central GST authorities have already adjudicated identical issues for the same assessment period. The pendency of an appeal against the earlier Central GST adjudication does not permit duplicate State GST proceedings on those matters. State GST assessment and rectification orders covering the same issues and period are therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798039</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>