<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 66 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798040</link>
    <description>Section 75(7) bars an adjudicating authority from confirming tax or penalty beyond the amounts specified in the show cause notice. Where the notice proposed tax of Rs. 96,000 and penalty of Rs. 20,000, confirmation of an equivalent Rs. 96,000 penalty exceeded the proposed penalty. Such excess confirmation breaches the mandatory statutory limit and is without jurisdiction. The penalty confirmation beyond the notice was invalid and was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 08:26:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=920031" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 66 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798040</link>
      <description>Section 75(7) bars an adjudicating authority from confirming tax or penalty beyond the amounts specified in the show cause notice. Where the notice proposed tax of Rs. 96,000 and penalty of Rs. 20,000, confirmation of an equivalent Rs. 96,000 penalty exceeded the proposed penalty. Such excess confirmation breaches the mandatory statutory limit and is without jurisdiction. The penalty confirmation beyond the notice was invalid and was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798040</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>