<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 68 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798042</link>
    <description>GST registration cancellation may be challenged through the statutory appeal under Section 107 within the prescribed period. Writ jurisdiction is generally unavailable where that alternate remedy remains unavailed and the appeal period has expired. Departure from the alternate-remedy rule requires exceptional circumstances; absent such circumstances, delay beyond the statutory appellate period does not justify writ interference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 09:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=920029" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 68 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798042</link>
      <description>GST registration cancellation may be challenged through the statutory appeal under Section 107 within the prescribed period. Writ jurisdiction is generally unavailable where that alternate remedy remains unavailed and the appeal period has expired. Departure from the alternate-remedy rule requires exceptional circumstances; absent such circumstances, delay beyond the statutory appellate period does not justify writ interference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798042</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>