<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 72 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798046</link>
    <description>Medical circumstances affecting the taxpayer&#039;s accountant, supported by medical records and the particular facts, constituted sufficient cause for condoning delay in filing a statutory GST appeal. The limitation-based dismissal was set aside so that the appellate remedy could be pursued. The underlying input tax credit dispute remained for determination by the Appellate Authority and was not decided at this stage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 09:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=920025" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 72 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798046</link>
      <description>Medical circumstances affecting the taxpayer&#039;s accountant, supported by medical records and the particular facts, constituted sufficient cause for condoning delay in filing a statutory GST appeal. The limitation-based dismissal was set aside so that the appellate remedy could be pursued. The underlying input tax credit dispute remained for determination by the Appellate Authority and was not decided at this stage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798046</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>