<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (11) TMI 158 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53525</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty liabilities on the imported raw materials and capital goods, allowing adjustments for duties already paid on cleared materials and finished goods. It rejected the depreciation claim on capital goods due to non-use for intended export manufacturing. A penalty was imposed for non-fulfillment of export obligations, albeit reduced considering the circumstances. The appeal was resolved accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2024 11:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92002" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (11) TMI 158 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53525</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty liabilities on the imported raw materials and capital goods, allowing adjustments for duties already paid on cleared materials and finished goods. It rejected the depreciation claim on capital goods due to non-use for intended export manufacturing. A penalty was imposed for non-fulfillment of export obligations, albeit reduced considering the circumstances. The appeal was resolved accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53525</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>