<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Binding Dispute Resolution Panel directions invalidate non-conforming assessments, while ad hoc nil pricing of intra-group services fails.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103276</link>
    <description>Dispute Resolution Panel directions bind the Assessing Officer when passing the final assessment order. Retaining a transfer-pricing adjustment despite directed relief is not a clerical error capable of rectification where the Transfer Pricing Officer and Assessing Officer consciously adopted the adjustment contrary to those directions; the final assessment order is consequently bad in law. Under the Other Method, arm&#039;s length pricing of intra-group technical and shared services requires comparable uncontrolled transactions or a stated basis for the valuation. The Transfer Pricing Officer cannot test commercial benefit and cannot determine a nil arm&#039;s length price on an ad hoc basis where evidence of service receipt and cost allocation remains undiscredited. The consequential transfer-pricing addition is deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 08:26:22 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 08:26:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=919997" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Binding Dispute Resolution Panel directions invalidate non-conforming assessments, while ad hoc nil pricing of intra-group services fails.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103276</link>
      <description>Dispute Resolution Panel directions bind the Assessing Officer when passing the final assessment order. Retaining a transfer-pricing adjustment despite directed relief is not a clerical error capable of rectification where the Transfer Pricing Officer and Assessing Officer consciously adopted the adjustment contrary to those directions; the final assessment order is consequently bad in law. Under the Other Method, arm&#039;s length pricing of intra-group technical and shared services requires comparable uncontrolled transactions or a stated basis for the valuation. The Transfer Pricing Officer cannot test commercial benefit and cannot determine a nil arm&#039;s length price on an ad hoc basis where evidence of service receipt and cost allocation remains undiscredited. The consequential transfer-pricing addition is deleted.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 08:26:22 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103276</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>