<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and margin findings.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103272</link>
    <description>Transfer-pricing benchmarking requires exclusion of comparables with financially illogical gross-profit-to-sales ratios of 100 per cent or more, applying the principle that super-profit-making companies should not be retained for comparability analysis. The inclusion of four such entities was set aside and remitted to the TPO for fresh consideration after hearing the assessee. A comparable could not be rejected for non-availability of its annual report where that report had been furnished to the TPO; its inclusion in the benchmarking exercise was directed. The TPO&#039;s positive gross-profit-margin computation for another comparable was also found erroneous because the record showed a negative margin, requiring fresh determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 08:26:22 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 08:26:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=919993" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and margin findings.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103272</link>
      <description>Transfer-pricing benchmarking requires exclusion of comparables with financially illogical gross-profit-to-sales ratios of 100 per cent or more, applying the principle that super-profit-making companies should not be retained for comparability analysis. The inclusion of four such entities was set aside and remitted to the TPO for fresh consideration after hearing the assessee. A comparable could not be rejected for non-availability of its annual report where that report had been furnished to the TPO; its inclusion in the benchmarking exercise was directed. The TPO&#039;s positive gross-profit-margin computation for another comparable was also found erroneous because the record showed a negative margin, requiring fresh determination.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 08:26:22 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103272</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>