<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (11) TMI 157 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53521</link>
    <description>A job worker under the valuation scheme could be fastened with central excise duty where undervaluation of grey fabrics supplied by merchant-manufacturers was found at its instance, and suppression justified invocation of the extended limitation period. A fresh recomputation of differential duty was not entertained because it was not supported by evidence before the adjudicating authority and was raised for the first time on appeal. Deemed credit was also held inadmissible once short-payment by suppression was established, and the penalties imposed under the central excise provisions were sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:56:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91998" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (11) TMI 157 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53521</link>
      <description>A job worker under the valuation scheme could be fastened with central excise duty where undervaluation of grey fabrics supplied by merchant-manufacturers was found at its instance, and suppression justified invocation of the extended limitation period. A fresh recomputation of differential duty was not entertained because it was not supported by evidence before the adjudicating authority and was raised for the first time on appeal. Deemed credit was also held inadmissible once short-payment by suppression was established, and the penalties imposed under the central excise provisions were sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53521</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>