<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1951 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471349</link>
    <description>Rejection of registration under section 12AB required fresh adjudication where fair opportunity warranted allowing submission of relevant documents before the competent authority. Approval under section 80G was consequential to the registration application and required reconsideration together with it. Both applications were remitted for fresh adjudication on merits, without any view on their merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 18:58:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=919964" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1951 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471349</link>
      <description>Rejection of registration under section 12AB required fresh adjudication where fair opportunity warranted allowing submission of relevant documents before the competent authority. Approval under section 80G was consequential to the registration application and required reconsideration together with it. Both applications were remitted for fresh adjudication on merits, without any view on their merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471349</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>