<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1984 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471337</link>
    <description>Interim protection against service-tax recovery was granted while the taxability of an equipment-supply transaction and an alleged computational error remain for consideration. Recovery of the impugned demand was stayed until the next hearing. The commissionerate must determine the pending rectification application after giving notice and an opportunity of hearing, ensuring that the asserted computation error is addressed before recovery proceeds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 15:06:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=919911" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1984 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471337</link>
      <description>Interim protection against service-tax recovery was granted while the taxability of an equipment-supply transaction and an alleged computational error remain for consideration. Recovery of the impugned demand was stayed until the next hearing. The commissionerate must determine the pending rectification application after giving notice and an opportunity of hearing, ensuring that the asserted computation error is addressed before recovery proceeds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471337</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>