<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 1638 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471336</link>
    <description>Transactional net margin method benchmarking of marketing, sales and technical support services requires functionally comparable companies. Entities providing diversified high-end consultancy, fund accounting, procurement consultancy, commission agency, technical services or business process outsourcing were unsuitable for routine marketing and sales support functions; a company with mixed activities and no segmental reporting was also unsuitable. Government undertakings providing specialised engineering, infrastructure, petroleum, water-resource, power, transport and railway consultancy were functionally different from technical support services. Apitco, Basiz Fund Service, Global Procurement Consultants, Orient Engineering &amp; Commercial, TSR Darashaw, Engineers India, WAPCOS and RITES were excluded from the final comparable set.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 17:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=919906" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 1638 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471336</link>
      <description>Transactional net margin method benchmarking of marketing, sales and technical support services requires functionally comparable companies. Entities providing diversified high-end consultancy, fund accounting, procurement consultancy, commission agency, technical services or business process outsourcing were unsuitable for routine marketing and sales support functions; a company with mixed activities and no segmental reporting was also unsuitable. Government undertakings providing specialised engineering, infrastructure, petroleum, water-resource, power, transport and railway consultancy were functionally different from technical support services. Apitco, Basiz Fund Service, Global Procurement Consultants, Orient Engineering &amp; Commercial, TSR Darashaw, Engineers India, WAPCOS and RITES were excluded from the final comparable set.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471336</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>