https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53512 Duty demand and penalties were found unsustainable where the alleged weighment discrepancy in cement was only about 1% and the appellate record showed a permissible margin of error of up to 2% under the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 and the rules. The factual variation was treated as within acceptable limits, and the possibility of differences between weighbridges and weighment methods was noted. As no contrary material dislodged those findings, confirmation of duty and penalty could not be sustained and the Revenue challenge failed. en-us Mon, 11 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:25:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53512 Duty demand and penalties were found unsustainable where the alleged weighment discrepancy in cement was only about 1% and the appellate record showed a permissible margin of error of up to 2% under the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 and the rules. The factual variation was treated as within acceptable limits, and the possibility of differences between weighbridges and weighment methods was noted. As no contrary material dislodged those findings, confirmation of duty and penalty could not be sustained and the Revenue challenge failed. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 11 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53512