<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>NATIONAL LITIGATION POLICY - EXCEPTION CARVED OUT IN CIRCULAR NOT PLEADED BEFORE LOWER COURTS- NOT ENTERTAINED BY SC SLP DISMISSED.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17321</link>
    <description>National Litigation Policy monetary thresholds restrict departmental customs appeals where the revenue involved falls below the prescribed limit, unless a recognised policy exception is timely invoked. The Tribunal treated the Revenue&#039;s appeal as not maintainable because the tax effect was below the applicable threshold. The High Court found no substantial question of law arising from that threshold-based disposal. A subsequently raised policy exception was not entertained because it had not been raised before the High Court. The analysis supports stricter scrutiny of delayed departmental appeals and withdrawal of proceedings barred by low-tax-effect policy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 08:29:37 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 08:29:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=919867" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>NATIONAL LITIGATION POLICY - EXCEPTION CARVED OUT IN CIRCULAR NOT PLEADED BEFORE LOWER COURTS- NOT ENTERTAINED BY SC SLP DISMISSED.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17321</link>
      <description>National Litigation Policy monetary thresholds restrict departmental customs appeals where the revenue involved falls below the prescribed limit, unless a recognised policy exception is timely invoked. The Tribunal treated the Revenue&#039;s appeal as not maintainable because the tax effect was below the applicable threshold. The High Court found no substantial question of law arising from that threshold-based disposal. A subsequently raised policy exception was not entertained because it had not been raised before the High Court. The analysis supports stricter scrutiny of delayed departmental appeals and withdrawal of proceedings barred by low-tax-effect policy.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Other Topics</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 08:29:37 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17321</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>