<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 1808 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797934</link>
    <description>Customs exemption eligibility for Battery Management Systems and Cell Supervisory Circuits depends on their technical character and whether they constitute Printed Circuit Board Assemblies excluded from the concessional rate. A credible independent expert opinion based on physical inspection and component-level analysis requires a reasoned technical response supported by comparable scientific or expert material; an adjudicating authority&#039;s unsupported technical view is insufficient. Where specialised technical evidence has been disregarded without such rebuttal, writ jurisdiction may be invoked despite an available statutory appeal. The products&#039; classification and exemption eligibility require fresh determination on a proper technical foundation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2026 13:21:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=919849" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 1808 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797934</link>
      <description>Customs exemption eligibility for Battery Management Systems and Cell Supervisory Circuits depends on their technical character and whether they constitute Printed Circuit Board Assemblies excluded from the concessional rate. A credible independent expert opinion based on physical inspection and component-level analysis requires a reasoned technical response supported by comparable scientific or expert material; an adjudicating authority&#039;s unsupported technical view is insufficient. Where specialised technical evidence has been disregarded without such rebuttal, writ jurisdiction may be invoked despite an available statutory appeal. The products&#039; classification and exemption eligibility require fresh determination on a proper technical foundation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797934</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>