<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 1845 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797971</link>
    <description>Expiry of the prescribed GST appeal period did not preclude pursuit of the statutory appellate remedy before the GST Appellate Tribunal after its constitution. Liberty was granted to file the appeal within fifteen days, with the period for which the writ petition remained pending to be taken into account, subject to compliance with statutory requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 08:28:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=919812" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 1845 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797971</link>
      <description>Expiry of the prescribed GST appeal period did not preclude pursuit of the statutory appellate remedy before the GST Appellate Tribunal after its constitution. Liberty was granted to file the appeal within fifteen days, with the period for which the writ petition remained pending to be taken into account, subject to compliance with statutory requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797971</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>