<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Input tax credit denial for supplier defaults requires reasoned reconsideration after natural justice breaches and jurisdictional defects.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103251</link>
    <description>Input tax credit denial to a bona fide purchaser based on a supplier&#039;s failure to deposit tax, file GSTR-3B, or reflect invoices in GSTR-2A requires proper consideration of the purchaser&#039;s reply and supporting evidence. The High Court found non-application of mind and breach of natural justice, and held that invocation of Section 74 of the CGST Act for financial year 2018-19 lacked jurisdiction. The adjudication order and consequential recovery notice were quashed. Fresh adjudication was directed after considering relevant precedents, granting a personal hearing, and issuing a reasoned speaking order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 08:28:49 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 08:28:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=919804" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Input tax credit denial for supplier defaults requires reasoned reconsideration after natural justice breaches and jurisdictional defects.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103251</link>
      <description>Input tax credit denial to a bona fide purchaser based on a supplier&#039;s failure to deposit tax, file GSTR-3B, or reflect invoices in GSTR-2A requires proper consideration of the purchaser&#039;s reply and supporting evidence. The High Court found non-application of mind and breach of natural justice, and held that invocation of Section 74 of the CGST Act for financial year 2018-19 lacked jurisdiction. The adjudication order and consequential recovery notice were quashed. Fresh adjudication was directed after considering relevant precedents, granting a personal hearing, and issuing a reasoned speaking order.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 08:28:49 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103251</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>