<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Revisionary jurisdiction cannot replace a completed inquiry merely because a broader factual verification is later preferred.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103240</link>
    <description>Revisionary jurisdiction cannot be invoked merely because a more extensive enquiry is preferred where the Assessing Officer has examined the deduction claim, obtained the statutory audit report and employee-wise details, issued a proposed disallowance notice, and considered the response. Revision requires an erroneous assessment that is prejudicial to Revenue, not simply an allegedly inadequate enquiry. Deduction eligibility is not denied solely because a staffing employer deploys workers at client premises, where it recruits, appoints, pays, reassigns and fulfils statutory employment obligations. Client supervision and salary reimbursement alone do not displace the employer-employee relationship. On these facts, revision for fresh examination was impermissible and the assessment was restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 08:28:49 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 08:28:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=919793" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Revisionary jurisdiction cannot replace a completed inquiry merely because a broader factual verification is later preferred.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103240</link>
      <description>Revisionary jurisdiction cannot be invoked merely because a more extensive enquiry is preferred where the Assessing Officer has examined the deduction claim, obtained the statutory audit report and employee-wise details, issued a proposed disallowance notice, and considered the response. Revision requires an erroneous assessment that is prejudicial to Revenue, not simply an allegedly inadequate enquiry. Deduction eligibility is not denied solely because a staffing employer deploys workers at client premises, where it recruits, appoints, pays, reassigns and fulfils statutory employment obligations. Client supervision and salary reimbursement alone do not displace the employer-employee relationship. On these facts, revision for fresh examination was impermissible and the assessment was restored.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 08:28:49 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103240</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>