<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>NBFC prudential-norm breaches may support oppression and mismanagement claims when combined with related-party dealings and governance failures.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103230</link>
    <description>For an RBI-regulated NBFC, breach of binding prudential norms may constitute conduct prejudicial to the company or public interest when assessed cumulatively with related-party dealings, inadequate compliance controls and governance failures. Regulatory penalties do not necessarily preclude oppression and mismanagement jurisdiction, because regulatory supervision and corporate-protection remedies address distinct concerns. Transactions involving related parties require demonstrable approval, documentation, security and recovery arrangements; retrospective omnibus approval may not validate earlier transactions. Resignations of compliance personnel and removal of independent directors may be relevant indicators of weakened governance safeguar.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 08:28:49 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 08:28:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=919783" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>NBFC prudential-norm breaches may support oppression and mismanagement claims when combined with related-party dealings and governance failures.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103230</link>
      <description>For an RBI-regulated NBFC, breach of binding prudential norms may constitute conduct prejudicial to the company or public interest when assessed cumulatively with related-party dealings, inadequate compliance controls and governance failures. Regulatory penalties do not necessarily preclude oppression and mismanagement jurisdiction, because regulatory supervision and corporate-protection remedies address distinct concerns. Transactions involving related parties require demonstrable approval, documentation, security and recovery arrangements; retrospective omnibus approval may not validate earlier transactions. Resignations of compliance personnel and removal of independent directors may be relevant indicators of weakened governance safeguar.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 08:28:49 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103230</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>