<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>SC Landmark Ruling: Mechanical Invocation of Fraud Cannot Extend Limitation under Section 74 of the CGST Act</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17309</link>
    <description>Section 74 of the CGST Act permits extended limitation only where fraud, wilful misstatement, or suppression of facts with intent to evade tax is established through allegations contained in the show cause notice itself. These are jurisdictional preconditions, not formal recitals. A notice cannot rely on a mechanical reference to &quot;fraud or concealment of facts&quot; without disclosing the material supporting that inference, and a counter affidavit cannot cure omissions in the notice. For legacy periods, a demand otherwise barred under Section 73 can proceed under Section 74 only on a properly pleaded statutory foundation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2026 14:37:04 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2026 14:37:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=919760" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>SC Landmark Ruling: Mechanical Invocation of Fraud Cannot Extend Limitation under Section 74 of the CGST Act</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17309</link>
      <description>Section 74 of the CGST Act permits extended limitation only where fraud, wilful misstatement, or suppression of facts with intent to evade tax is established through allegations contained in the show cause notice itself. These are jurisdictional preconditions, not formal recitals. A notice cannot rely on a mechanical reference to &quot;fraud or concealment of facts&quot; without disclosing the material supporting that inference, and a counter affidavit cannot cure omissions in the notice. For legacy periods, a demand otherwise barred under Section 73 can proceed under Section 74 only on a properly pleaded statutory foundation.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Goods and Services Tax - GST</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2026 14:37:04 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17309</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>