<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 1858 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471318</link>
    <description>Municipalities&#039; service-tax liability for renting immovable property requires fresh adjudication where jurisdictional High Court rulings on local-authority taxability reflect divergent views and related appeals remain pending. Judicial discipline and consistency with an earlier decision require the adjudicating authority to re-examine the Municipality&#039;s taxability rather than retain the appellate determination. The impugned appellate order was set aside, and the issue was remanded for a fresh decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2026 14:35:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=919757" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 1858 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471318</link>
      <description>Municipalities&#039; service-tax liability for renting immovable property requires fresh adjudication where jurisdictional High Court rulings on local-authority taxability reflect divergent views and related appeals remain pending. Judicial discipline and consistency with an earlier decision require the adjudicating authority to re-examine the Municipality&#039;s taxability rather than retain the appellate determination. The impugned appellate order was set aside, and the issue was remanded for a fresh decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471318</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>