<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (8) TMI 280 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53497</link>
    <description>Allegations of clandestine removal require cogent, tangible and corroborated evidence; rate contract terms, untested dealer statements and unverified assumptions were treated as insufficient by themselves. Private spiral pad entries also could not establish clandestine production without independent support such as inputs, power, labour or sales evidence, and the SSI threshold issue depended on whether the disputed clearances were first excluded. Shortages of finished goods and base paper stood on a different footing: unaccounted stock justified duty liability, confiscation with reduced redemption fine, MODVAT credit reversal, and modification of penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2024 14:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91974" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (8) TMI 280 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53497</link>
      <description>Allegations of clandestine removal require cogent, tangible and corroborated evidence; rate contract terms, untested dealer statements and unverified assumptions were treated as insufficient by themselves. Private spiral pad entries also could not establish clandestine production without independent support such as inputs, power, labour or sales evidence, and the SSI threshold issue depended on whether the disputed clearances were first excluded. Shortages of finished goods and base paper stood on a different footing: unaccounted stock justified duty liability, confiscation with reduced redemption fine, MODVAT credit reversal, and modification of penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53497</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>