<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (10) TMI 197 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53495</link>
    <description>An assessee using a foreign brand name exclusively assigned for use in India was held eligible for small scale industry exemption because the assignment gave it exclusive user rights and no competing claimant existed. The extended-period demand was also held unsustainable because earlier favourable Tribunal decisions supported a bona fide belief that such use did not disqualify the exemption, defeating limitation on that basis. The impugned order was set aside and relief was granted on both exemption eligibility and limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 15:48:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91972" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (10) TMI 197 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53495</link>
      <description>An assessee using a foreign brand name exclusively assigned for use in India was held eligible for small scale industry exemption because the assignment gave it exclusive user rights and no competing claimant existed. The extended-period demand was also held unsustainable because earlier favourable Tribunal decisions supported a bona fide belief that such use did not disqualify the exemption, defeating limitation on that basis. The impugned order was set aside and relief was granted on both exemption eligibility and limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53495</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>