<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 1776 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797902</link>
    <description>Section 56(2)(vii)(b) applies only where the acquired property is a capital asset. Agricultural land that falls outside the definition of a capital asset is therefore outside the scope of the provision, even where its stamp-duty value exceeds the purchase consideration. As the land&#039;s agricultural character was undisputed, the difference between the purchase price and stamp-duty value was not taxable as income from other sources. The addition based on that difference was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2026 14:35:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=919715" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 1776 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797902</link>
      <description>Section 56(2)(vii)(b) applies only where the acquired property is a capital asset. Agricultural land that falls outside the definition of a capital asset is therefore outside the scope of the provision, even where its stamp-duty value exceeds the purchase consideration. As the land&#039;s agricultural character was undisputed, the difference between the purchase price and stamp-duty value was not taxable as income from other sources. The addition based on that difference was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797902</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>