<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 1778 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797904</link>
    <description>Section 249(4)(b) requires a non-filer to pay an amount equal to advance tax payable before pursuing an appeal, unless the Commissioner (Appeals) grants exemption on good and sufficient reason. Advance-tax liability under Section 209(1) depends on computation by the assessee or Assessing Officer. Where neither has computed advance tax, a claim of no taxable income and therefore no advance-tax liability cannot be summarily rejected. The assessee must have an opportunity to establish that Section 249(4)(b) does not apply or to seek exemption under its proviso. Dismissal for non-compliance was set aside for reconsideration of admissibility and, where appropriate, merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2026 14:35:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=919713" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 1778 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797904</link>
      <description>Section 249(4)(b) requires a non-filer to pay an amount equal to advance tax payable before pursuing an appeal, unless the Commissioner (Appeals) grants exemption on good and sufficient reason. Advance-tax liability under Section 209(1) depends on computation by the assessee or Assessing Officer. Where neither has computed advance tax, a claim of no taxable income and therefore no advance-tax liability cannot be summarily rejected. The assessee must have an opportunity to establish that Section 249(4)(b) does not apply or to seek exemption under its proviso. Dismissal for non-compliance was set aside for reconsideration of admissibility and, where appropriate, merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797904</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>