<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 1780 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797906</link>
    <description>Rule 11UA permits valuation of unquoted preference shares through a report from either an accountant or a merchant banker; an independent valuer&#039;s report is not exclusively required. A valuation certificate already furnished during first appellate proceedings is not additional evidence for Rule 46A purposes merely because it is relied upon before the Tribunal. Fair market value under Section 56(2)(viia) must follow the prescribed statutory valuation method. An isolated third-party share transaction cannot displace valuation evidence based on audited financial statements and applicable redemption terms. Statutory valuation evidence supported the stated preference-share consideration within the applicable fair-market-value parameters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2026 14:35:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=919711" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 1780 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797906</link>
      <description>Rule 11UA permits valuation of unquoted preference shares through a report from either an accountant or a merchant banker; an independent valuer&#039;s report is not exclusively required. A valuation certificate already furnished during first appellate proceedings is not additional evidence for Rule 46A purposes merely because it is relied upon before the Tribunal. Fair market value under Section 56(2)(viia) must follow the prescribed statutory valuation method. An isolated third-party share transaction cannot displace valuation evidence based on audited financial statements and applicable redemption terms. Statutory valuation evidence supported the stated preference-share consideration within the applicable fair-market-value parameters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797906</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>