<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Revision for alleged lack of inquiry fails where assessment records show inquiries, application of mind, and no identified defects.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103216</link>
    <description>Revision of an assessment for lack of inquiry requires an erroneous and prejudicial order, not merely a different view of matters examined during scrutiny. Where the Assessing Officer made inquiries into depreciation on fixed assets, commission paid to a non-resident, and deductions for employing new workmen, and applied mind to the responses, revision was not sustainable. The Principal Commissioner had identified neither a flaw in the assessee&#039;s replies nor a specific defect in the prescribed audit report. The revision order was quashed, and the tax appeal was dismissed because the Tribunal&#039;s findings disclosed no legal infirmity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2026 14:35:41 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2026 14:35:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=919688" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Revision for alleged lack of inquiry fails where assessment records show inquiries, application of mind, and no identified defects.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103216</link>
      <description>Revision of an assessment for lack of inquiry requires an erroneous and prejudicial order, not merely a different view of matters examined during scrutiny. Where the Assessing Officer made inquiries into depreciation on fixed assets, commission paid to a non-resident, and deductions for employing new workmen, and applied mind to the responses, revision was not sustainable. The Principal Commissioner had identified neither a flaw in the assessee&#039;s replies nor a specific defect in the prescribed audit report. The revision order was quashed, and the tax appeal was dismissed because the Tribunal&#039;s findings disclosed no legal infirmity.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2026 14:35:41 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103216</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>