<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Sebi bars Trafiksol ITS, its promoters from securities market for 1 year; slaps Rs 1.05 cr fine</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74523</link>
    <description>SEBI restrained Trafiksol ITS Technologies Ltd. and its promoter-directors from accessing or dealing in the securities market for one year and imposed monetary penalties over irregularities in its SME IPO. The action concerned overstated financial disclosures, inadequate disclosure of issue expenditure and a potential merchant-banker conflict, and proposed use of IPO proceeds based on a fabricated software-vendor quotation. The listing was deferred and IPO proceeds were placed in an interest-bearing escrow account. One promoter was directly involved in procuring the quotation, while the other failed to exercise due diligence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2026 00:31:02 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2026 00:31:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=919623" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Sebi bars Trafiksol ITS, its promoters from securities market for 1 year; slaps Rs 1.05 cr fine</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74523</link>
      <description>SEBI restrained Trafiksol ITS Technologies Ltd. and its promoter-directors from accessing or dealing in the securities market for one year and imposed monetary penalties over irregularities in its SME IPO. The action concerned overstated financial disclosures, inadequate disclosure of issue expenditure and a potential merchant-banker conflict, and proposed use of IPO proceeds based on a fabricated software-vendor quotation. The listing was deferred and IPO proceeds were placed in an interest-bearing escrow account. One promoter was directly involved in procuring the quotation, while the other failed to exercise due diligence.</description>
      <category>News</category>
      <law>-</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2026 00:31:02 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74523</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>