<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 1700 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797826</link>
    <description>Excess excise duty collected by including stenter galleries in annual production capacity is treated as an unconstitutional levy where galleries must be excluded under the capacity-determination rules. Annual capacity determination is an administrative exercise rather than an appealable order; failure to challenge it therefore does not bar a refund claim. The statutory doctrine of unjust enrichment does not apply to such recovery of duty collected without legal authority. Annual production capacity must be redetermined after excluding galleries, and the resulting refund claim processed without requiring proof that the duty incidence was not passed on.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 20:42:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=919573" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 1700 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797826</link>
      <description>Excess excise duty collected by including stenter galleries in annual production capacity is treated as an unconstitutional levy where galleries must be excluded under the capacity-determination rules. Annual capacity determination is an administrative exercise rather than an appealable order; failure to challenge it therefore does not bar a refund claim. The statutory doctrine of unjust enrichment does not apply to such recovery of duty collected without legal authority. Annual production capacity must be redetermined after excluding galleries, and the resulting refund claim processed without requiring proof that the duty incidence was not passed on.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797826</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>