<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 1701 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797827</link>
    <description>Marketing and promotional services were treated as export of service under the Export of Service Rules, 2005, because they fell within the applicable service category and Board circular framework. The Revenue&#039;s challenge repeated earlier contentions and did not identify grounds to disturb the Tribunal&#039;s classification. The precedent invoked by the Revenue was not comparable and did not support contrary treatment of the services.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 20:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=919572" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 1701 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797827</link>
      <description>Marketing and promotional services were treated as export of service under the Export of Service Rules, 2005, because they fell within the applicable service category and Board circular framework. The Revenue&#039;s challenge repeated earlier contentions and did not identify grounds to disturb the Tribunal&#039;s classification. The precedent invoked by the Revenue was not comparable and did not support contrary treatment of the services.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797827</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>