<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 1707 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797833</link>
    <description>Confirmation of a provisional attachment for alleged proceeds of crime requires a subsisting Scheduled Offence and must rest on the material recorded in the provisional attachment order, reasons to believe, and original confirmation complaint. A subsequently registered FIR, even if added to the ECIR, may provide a fresh basis for action but cannot retrospectively validate an existing attachment. Clubbing FIRs for a common investigation does not ordinarily extend the effect of an earlier cognizance-related order to a later FIR. Where the underlying FIRs are quashed or closed, no predicate offence survives and the attachment lacks statutory foundation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 20:42:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=919566" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 1707 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797833</link>
      <description>Confirmation of a provisional attachment for alleged proceeds of crime requires a subsisting Scheduled Offence and must rest on the material recorded in the provisional attachment order, reasons to believe, and original confirmation complaint. A subsequently registered FIR, even if added to the ECIR, may provide a fresh basis for action but cannot retrospectively validate an existing attachment. Clubbing FIRs for a common investigation does not ordinarily extend the effect of an earlier cognizance-related order to a later FIR. Where the underlying FIRs are quashed or closed, no predicate offence survives and the attachment lacks statutory foundation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797833</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>