<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 1737 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797863</link>
    <description>Penalty for concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars cannot survive where the sole underlying bad-debt disallowance has been deleted and that deletion stands confirmed. With no surviving tax addition, there is no basis to sustain penalty in respect of alleged concealment or inaccurate particulars linked to that addition. Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was therefore deleted in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 20:42:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=919536" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 1737 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797863</link>
      <description>Penalty for concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars cannot survive where the sole underlying bad-debt disallowance has been deleted and that deletion stands confirmed. With no surviving tax addition, there is no basis to sustain penalty in respect of alleged concealment or inaccurate particulars linked to that addition. Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was therefore deleted in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797863</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>