https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797866 Article 226 writ jurisdiction is discretionary and ordinarily should not be used to challenge reassessment proceedings where the reassessment order itself is not impugned and the taxpayer has already pursued a pending statutory appeal against that order. Invoking an effective statutory remedy for the same cause precludes parallel proceedings seeking substantially the same relief through writ jurisdiction. The reassessment challenge is therefore not maintainable, and no writ interference is warranted while the statutory appeal remains pending. en-us Tue, 25 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 28 Aug 2026 20:42:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797866 Article 226 writ jurisdiction is discretionary and ordinarily should not be used to challenge reassessment proceedings where the reassessment order itself is not impugned and the taxpayer has already pursued a pending statutory appeal against that order. Invoking an effective statutory remedy for the same cause precludes parallel proceedings seeking substantially the same relief through writ jurisdiction. The reassessment challenge is therefore not maintainable, and no writ interference is warranted while the statutory appeal remains pending. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 25 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797866