<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (10) TMI 183 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53472</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal set aside the order confiscating a consignment of Pseudoionone under the Customs Act, 1962, and confirmed duty and penalties, ruling the confiscation and duty demand unjustified. The tribunal found the detention illegal, allowing release to importers for export obligation fulfillment within six months. Allegations of fraudulent export were dismissed, emphasizing fairness and compliance opportunities for the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 15:11:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91949" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (10) TMI 183 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53472</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal set aside the order confiscating a consignment of Pseudoionone under the Customs Act, 1962, and confirmed duty and penalties, ruling the confiscation and duty demand unjustified. The tribunal found the detention illegal, allowing release to importers for export obligation fulfillment within six months. Allegations of fraudulent export were dismissed, emphasizing fairness and compliance opportunities for the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53472</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>