<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 1414 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471284</link>
    <description>COVID-19-related inability to leave India during Financial Year 2020-21 raised the question whether the resulting period of stay should be excluded when determining residential status. Earlier CBDT relief applied to Financial Year 2019-20, while comparable relief for the subsequent year remained under consideration following a representation. The taxpayer was required to submit a representation to CBDT within three days, and CBDT was required to consider it within three weeks of receipt.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2026 17:02:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=919458" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 1414 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471284</link>
      <description>COVID-19-related inability to leave India during Financial Year 2020-21 raised the question whether the resulting period of stay should be excluded when determining residential status. Earlier CBDT relief applied to Financial Year 2019-20, while comparable relief for the subsequent year remained under consideration following a representation. The taxpayer was required to submit a representation to CBDT within three days, and CBDT was required to consider it within three weeks of receipt.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471284</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>