<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 1615 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797741</link>
    <description>Approved resolution plans under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code bind members and can validly extinguish pre-CIRP equity shareholding and consequential membership rights. Section 59 of the Companies Act provides a limited rectification remedy for entries or omissions made without sufficient cause; it cannot collaterally reopen an approved plan or revive extinguished shares. Membership in a share-capital company remains inseparable from shareholding, while post-implementation annual returns reflect restructured capital rather than continuity of cancelled holdings. Administrative register provisions and procedural rules create no independent substantive entitlement. Claims for replacement shares, compensation, interest, or mental-suffering damages inconsistent with plan finality fall outside rectification jurisdiction; the Code&#039;s overriding effect prevails over inconsistent company-law remedies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2026 08:28:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=919373" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 1615 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797741</link>
      <description>Approved resolution plans under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code bind members and can validly extinguish pre-CIRP equity shareholding and consequential membership rights. Section 59 of the Companies Act provides a limited rectification remedy for entries or omissions made without sufficient cause; it cannot collaterally reopen an approved plan or revive extinguished shares. Membership in a share-capital company remains inseparable from shareholding, while post-implementation annual returns reflect restructured capital rather than continuity of cancelled holdings. Administrative register provisions and procedural rules create no independent substantive entitlement. Claims for replacement shares, compensation, interest, or mental-suffering damages inconsistent with plan finality fall outside rectification jurisdiction; the Code&#039;s overriding effect prevails over inconsistent company-law remedies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797741</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>