<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (10) TMI 167 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53452</link>
    <description>Inadmissible utilisation of CENVAT credit for duty payment was treated as clearance without payment of appropriate duty, because the credit was not available on the relevant dates and later adjustment did not cure the defect. The Tribunal held that the duty demand was recoverable in cash and upheld the demand. On penalty, the wrongful debit attracted liability, but the full penalty was found excessive on the facts. The penalty was therefore sustained in principle but reduced to Rs. one lakh, giving partial relief while confirming the underlying duty liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 14:08:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91929" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (10) TMI 167 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53452</link>
      <description>Inadmissible utilisation of CENVAT credit for duty payment was treated as clearance without payment of appropriate duty, because the credit was not available on the relevant dates and later adjustment did not cure the defect. The Tribunal held that the duty demand was recoverable in cash and upheld the demand. On penalty, the wrongful debit attracted liability, but the full penalty was found excessive on the facts. The penalty was therefore sustained in principle but reduced to Rs. one lakh, giving partial relief while confirming the underlying duty liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53452</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>