<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (10) TMI 166 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53451</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi ruled in favor of the appellant in a case involving the denial of Modvat credit for duty paid on crude Iodine used in the production of Iodine of I.P. standard. The Tribunal found the Revenue&#039;s position contradictory, stating that if the conversion of crude Iodine is considered manufacturing for duty assessment, then Modvat credit should be allowed for all inputs in its production. As a result, the denial of Modvat credit was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 14:07:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91928" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (10) TMI 166 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53451</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi ruled in favor of the appellant in a case involving the denial of Modvat credit for duty paid on crude Iodine used in the production of Iodine of I.P. standard. The Tribunal found the Revenue&#039;s position contradictory, stating that if the conversion of crude Iodine is considered manufacturing for duty assessment, then Modvat credit should be allowed for all inputs in its production. As a result, the denial of Modvat credit was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53451</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>