<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (8) TMI 270 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53450</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Recall of Order (ROM) application, as it found no error apparent on the face of the record in the non-consideration of case laws cited during the appeal. The Tribunal emphasized that the order was passed after considering all facts and materials on record, and the absence of cited case laws during the hearing meant they were not included in the final order. The application was distinguished from precedents where judicial precedents were not taken into account, leading to the dismissal of the ROM application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 14:05:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91927" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (8) TMI 270 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53450</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Recall of Order (ROM) application, as it found no error apparent on the face of the record in the non-consideration of case laws cited during the appeal. The Tribunal emphasized that the order was passed after considering all facts and materials on record, and the absence of cited case laws during the hearing meant they were not included in the final order. The application was distinguished from precedents where judicial precedents were not taken into account, leading to the dismissal of the ROM application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53450</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>