<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 1498 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471242</link>
    <description>Penalty orders for concealment or inaccurate particulars require a reasoned factual adjudication of each underlying disallowance or addition. Where the appellate order does not discuss the factual basis of alleged unexplained expenditure, administrative expenses, payments to doctors, enhanced unexplained expenditure and other disallowances, the penalty cannot be examined on merits. The penalty orders were set aside and remitted for fresh issue-wise adjudication through speaking orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 14:46:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=919178" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 1498 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471242</link>
      <description>Penalty orders for concealment or inaccurate particulars require a reasoned factual adjudication of each underlying disallowance or addition. Where the appellate order does not discuss the factual basis of alleged unexplained expenditure, administrative expenses, payments to doctors, enhanced unexplained expenditure and other disallowances, the penalty cannot be examined on merits. The penalty orders were set aside and remitted for fresh issue-wise adjudication through speaking orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471242</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>