<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (12) TMI 805 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471240</link>
    <description>Delay in filing was condoned, but the civil appeal was dismissed. No reasons, factual findings, statutory interpretation, or substantive legal issue are set out. The operative effect is dismissal of the civil appeal notwithstanding condonation of delay, without any stated legal principle or guidance on the underlying central excise dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 13:11:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=919170" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (12) TMI 805 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471240</link>
      <description>Delay in filing was condoned, but the civil appeal was dismissed. No reasons, factual findings, statutory interpretation, or substantive legal issue are set out. The operative effect is dismissal of the civil appeal notwithstanding condonation of delay, without any stated legal principle or guidance on the underlying central excise dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471240</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>