<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>GST demand limitation bars late notices unless extended recovery is supported by foundational fraud or suppression facts.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103100</link>
    <description>GST demand limitation under Section 73 runs from the due date for the annual return; extensions of those due dates change its commencement, and pandemic-period exclusion must be applied when calculating the three-year period. A notice issued after the resulting deadline cannot be sustained under the ordinary limitation. Recourse to Section 74&#039;s five-year period requires the Assessing Officer&#039;s satisfaction, based on disclosed foundational facts, that fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression caused the tax shortfall or excess input tax credit. Audit objections and bare statutory assertions are insufficient. The show-cause notice and consequential order were set aside, with liberty for fresh Section 74 proceedings within the applicable extended limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 11:53:11 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 11:53:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=919159" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>GST demand limitation bars late notices unless extended recovery is supported by foundational fraud or suppression facts.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103100</link>
      <description>GST demand limitation under Section 73 runs from the due date for the annual return; extensions of those due dates change its commencement, and pandemic-period exclusion must be applied when calculating the three-year period. A notice issued after the resulting deadline cannot be sustained under the ordinary limitation. Recourse to Section 74&#039;s five-year period requires the Assessing Officer&#039;s satisfaction, based on disclosed foundational facts, that fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression caused the tax shortfall or excess input tax credit. Audit objections and bare statutory assertions are insufficient. The show-cause notice and consequential order were set aside, with liberty for fresh Section 74 proceedings within the applicable extended limitation.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 11:53:11 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103100</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>