<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Revenue burdening the Supreme Court with an unnecessary special leave petition that too with long delays and adding to the pendency.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17287</link>
    <description>Government tax litigation is criticised where a delayed special leave petition is pursued despite the issue being covered by an earlier precedent and concurrent appellate orders favour the taxpayer. The concern focuses on counsel&#039;s assessment of merits, avoidable judicial pendency, and public expenditure arising from multiple advocates in covered appeals. Withdrawal of covered or low-tax-effect appeals through written applications and delegated administrative decision-making is proposed to reduce unnecessary litigation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 08:30:21 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 08:30:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=919125" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Revenue burdening the Supreme Court with an unnecessary special leave petition that too with long delays and adding to the pendency.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17287</link>
      <description>Government tax litigation is criticised where a delayed special leave petition is pursued despite the issue being covered by an earlier precedent and concurrent appellate orders favour the taxpayer. The concern focuses on counsel&#039;s assessment of merits, avoidable judicial pendency, and public expenditure arising from multiple advocates in covered appeals. Withdrawal of covered or low-tax-effect appeals through written applications and delegated administrative decision-making is proposed to reduce unnecessary litigation.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Other Topics</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 08:30:21 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17287</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>