<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 1500 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797626</link>
    <description>Deposited interest, distinct from the principal amount, was required to be returned to the applicant after the review petition between the same parties had been dismissed. Repeated representations made to the State were considered, and the sum held as interest was to be refunded by the respondent-State within eight weeks. The direction concerned only the deposited interest component.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 08:27:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=919116" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 1500 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797626</link>
      <description>Deposited interest, distinct from the principal amount, was required to be returned to the applicant after the review petition between the same parties had been dismissed. Repeated representations made to the State were considered, and the sum held as interest was to be refunded by the respondent-State within eight weeks. The direction concerned only the deposited interest component.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797626</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>