<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 1520 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797646</link>
    <description>Review jurisdiction under Order 47 Rule 1 does not permit correction of an earlier judgment merely because it is alleged to be incorrect. Where the challenged observations are fact-specific and consistent with the judgment&#039;s overall findings, they do not establish a reviewable error. Rectification through review is therefore unavailable in the absence of a permissible ground for review.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 18:06:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=919096" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 1520 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797646</link>
      <description>Review jurisdiction under Order 47 Rule 1 does not permit correction of an earlier judgment merely because it is alleged to be incorrect. Where the challenged observations are fact-specific and consistent with the judgment&#039;s overall findings, they do not establish a reviewable error. Rectification through review is therefore unavailable in the absence of a permissible ground for review.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797646</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>