<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 1569 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797695</link>
    <description>Reassessment initiated solely on investigation-wing information without independent enquiry, verification, or application of mind is vulnerable as borrowed satisfaction. Where recorded reasons do not connect the taxpayer&#039;s actual transactions to named entities, reopening lacks a proper factual foundation. An unexplained-credit addition is unsustainable when lender confirmations, ledger accounts, bank records of receipt and repayment, and interest-payment evidence remain unrebutted. Amounts representing reversal of payments to another creditor cannot be treated as fresh loans. Reliance on adverse third-party statements without granting requested cross-examination also cannot displace reliable documentary evidence, including for consequential alleged commission expenditure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 08:27:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=919047" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 1569 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797695</link>
      <description>Reassessment initiated solely on investigation-wing information without independent enquiry, verification, or application of mind is vulnerable as borrowed satisfaction. Where recorded reasons do not connect the taxpayer&#039;s actual transactions to named entities, reopening lacks a proper factual foundation. An unexplained-credit addition is unsustainable when lender confirmations, ledger accounts, bank records of receipt and repayment, and interest-payment evidence remain unrebutted. Amounts representing reversal of payments to another creditor cannot be treated as fresh loans. Reliance on adverse third-party statements without granting requested cross-examination also cannot displace reliable documentary evidence, including for consequential alleged commission expenditure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797695</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>