<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>TNMM Benchmarking Bars Separate AMP Adjustment Where Interlinked Transactions Are Already Accepted at Arm&#039;s Length</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103087</link>
    <description>Under TNMM, advertising, marketing and promotion expenditure included in operating costs cannot be separately benchmarked where inter-linked agency commission, advertising sales and marketing-service transactions have already been accepted at arm&#039;s length. A separate method for that horizontal cost item would distort the arm&#039;s-length determination; therefore, substantive and protective AMP adjustments were deleted. Whether working-capital adjustments were already reflected in the tested margins and comparable financials must be verified, since that would preclude a separate interest adjustment on outstanding receivables. The Form 26AS income mismatch, including claimed associated-enterprise receipts and mutual-agreement-procedure coverage, requires factual verification with admitted additional evidence. Both verification issues were remitted for fresh decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 08:27:49 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 08:27:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=919017" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>TNMM Benchmarking Bars Separate AMP Adjustment Where Interlinked Transactions Are Already Accepted at Arm&#039;s Length</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103087</link>
      <description>Under TNMM, advertising, marketing and promotion expenditure included in operating costs cannot be separately benchmarked where inter-linked agency commission, advertising sales and marketing-service transactions have already been accepted at arm&#039;s length. A separate method for that horizontal cost item would distort the arm&#039;s-length determination; therefore, substantive and protective AMP adjustments were deleted. Whether working-capital adjustments were already reflected in the tested margins and comparable financials must be verified, since that would preclude a separate interest adjustment on outstanding receivables. The Form 26AS income mismatch, including claimed associated-enterprise receipts and mutual-agreement-procedure coverage, requires factual verification with admitted additional evidence. Both verification issues were remitted for fresh decision.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 08:27:49 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103087</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>