<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Inadequate inquiry under section 263 requires proven inquiry failure, not merely a different revisional view on share gains.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103085</link>
    <description>Revision for inadequate inquiry under section 263 requires a showing that the Assessing Officer&#039;s inquiry was inadequate; a different revisional view alone does not satisfy Explanation 2(a). Reassessment initiated on specific information about alleged penny-stock share transactions involved queries and consideration of contract notes, brokerage and ledger records, and bank statements. Acceptance of short-term capital gains as genuine was therefore a plausible view. The reassessment order was not erroneous or prejudicial to Revenue interests, the revision was annulled, and the proposed-addition challenge became infructuous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 08:27:49 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 08:27:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=919015" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Inadequate inquiry under section 263 requires proven inquiry failure, not merely a different revisional view on share gains.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103085</link>
      <description>Revision for inadequate inquiry under section 263 requires a showing that the Assessing Officer&#039;s inquiry was inadequate; a different revisional view alone does not satisfy Explanation 2(a). Reassessment initiated on specific information about alleged penny-stock share transactions involved queries and consideration of contract notes, brokerage and ledger records, and bank statements. Acceptance of short-term capital gains as genuine was therefore a plausible view. The reassessment order was not erroneous or prejudicial to Revenue interests, the revision was annulled, and the proposed-addition challenge became infructuous.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 08:27:49 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103085</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>