<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Proceeds-of-crime proof is required before continued PMLA freezing; general bribery allegations and investigative necessity are insufficient.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103070</link>
    <description>Under the PMLA, continued freezing or retention of property requires material linking the property to proceeds of crime and a statutory finding that it is involved in money laundering. General allegations of bribery, unconnected to identified transactions or quantified proceeds held by the property holder, do not meet that standard; continued freezing based solely on investigative necessity is unsustainable. Attachment, seizure and freezing may extend to property held by persons not named in the scheduled offence or money-laundering proceedings. Reasons to believe for search or freezing must be recorded, but post-recording communication is not mandatory where the show-cause notice incorporates the relevant reasons. Filing a prosecution complaint does not remove the Appellate Tribunal&#039;s jurisdiction over a freezing-confirmation order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 08:27:49 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 08:27:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=919000" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Proceeds-of-crime proof is required before continued PMLA freezing; general bribery allegations and investigative necessity are insufficient.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103070</link>
      <description>Under the PMLA, continued freezing or retention of property requires material linking the property to proceeds of crime and a statutory finding that it is involved in money laundering. General allegations of bribery, unconnected to identified transactions or quantified proceeds held by the property holder, do not meet that standard; continued freezing based solely on investigative necessity is unsustainable. Attachment, seizure and freezing may extend to property held by persons not named in the scheduled offence or money-laundering proceedings. Reasons to believe for search or freezing must be recorded, but post-recording communication is not mandatory where the show-cause notice incorporates the relevant reasons. Filing a prosecution complaint does not remove the Appellate Tribunal&#039;s jurisdiction over a freezing-confirmation order.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 08:27:49 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103070</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>